Get a free quote

Systems and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these systems. By lie diagnosis tools tested at the boundary to a program for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being used by asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to understand these systems and to follow their legal right for safeguard.

It also demonstrates how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from interacting with the stations of security. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of these technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are disciplined by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article states that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: when they aid to expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult with regards to refugees to navigate these systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions created by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published.